- Journal Home
- Volume 18 - 2025
- Volume 17 - 2024
- Volume 16 - 2023
- Volume 15 - 2022
- Volume 14 - 2021
- Volume 13 - 2020
- Volume 12 - 2019
- Volume 11 - 2018
- Volume 10 - 2017
- Volume 9 - 2016
- Volume 8 - 2015
- Volume 7 - 2014
- Volume 6 - 2013
- Volume 5 - 2012
- Volume 4 - 2011
- Volume 3 - 2010
- Volume 2 - 2009
- Volume 1 - 2008
Numer. Math. Theor. Meth. Appl., 16 (2023), pp. 26-57.
Published online: 2023-01
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
An adapted-bubbles approach which is a modification of the residual-free bubbles (RFB) method, is proposed for the Helmholtz problem in 2D. A new two-level finite element method is introduced for the approximations of the bubble functions. Unlike the other equations such as the advection-diffusion equation, RFB method when applied to the Helmholtz equation, does not depend on another stabilized method to obtain approximations to the solutions of the sub-problems. Adapted-bubbles (AB) are obtained by a simple modification of the sub-problems. This modification increases the accuracy of the numerical solution impressively. We provide numerical experiments with the AB method up to $ch = 5$ where $c$ is the wavenumber and $h$ is the mesh size. Numerical tests show that the AB method is better by far than higher order methods available in the literature.
}, issn = {2079-7338}, doi = {https://doi.org/ 10.4208/nmtma.OA-2022-0083}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/nmtma/21342.html} }An adapted-bubbles approach which is a modification of the residual-free bubbles (RFB) method, is proposed for the Helmholtz problem in 2D. A new two-level finite element method is introduced for the approximations of the bubble functions. Unlike the other equations such as the advection-diffusion equation, RFB method when applied to the Helmholtz equation, does not depend on another stabilized method to obtain approximations to the solutions of the sub-problems. Adapted-bubbles (AB) are obtained by a simple modification of the sub-problems. This modification increases the accuracy of the numerical solution impressively. We provide numerical experiments with the AB method up to $ch = 5$ where $c$ is the wavenumber and $h$ is the mesh size. Numerical tests show that the AB method is better by far than higher order methods available in the literature.