- Journal Home
- Volume 43 - 2025
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
We consider the numerical solution by finite difference methods of the heat equation in one space dimension, with a nonlocal integral boundary condition, resulting from the truncation to a finite interval of the problem on a semi-infinite interval. We first analyze the forward Euler method, and then the $θ$-method for $0 < θ ≤ 1$, in both cases in maximum-norm, showing $O(h^2 + k)$ error bounds, where $h$ is the mesh-width and $k$ the time step. We then give an alternative analysis for the case $θ = 1/2$, the Crank-Nicolson method, using energy arguments, yielding a $O(h^2$ + $k^{3/2}$) error bound. Special attention is given the approximation of the boundary integral operator. Our results are illustrated by numerical examples.
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1406-m4443}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/9825.html} }We consider the numerical solution by finite difference methods of the heat equation in one space dimension, with a nonlocal integral boundary condition, resulting from the truncation to a finite interval of the problem on a semi-infinite interval. We first analyze the forward Euler method, and then the $θ$-method for $0 < θ ≤ 1$, in both cases in maximum-norm, showing $O(h^2 + k)$ error bounds, where $h$ is the mesh-width and $k$ the time step. We then give an alternative analysis for the case $θ = 1/2$, the Crank-Nicolson method, using energy arguments, yielding a $O(h^2$ + $k^{3/2}$) error bound. Special attention is given the approximation of the boundary integral operator. Our results are illustrated by numerical examples.