- Journal Home
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In this paper we modify the MEBDF method using the NDFs as predictors instead of the BDFs. We have done it in three different ways: changing both predictors of the MEBDF, changing only the first predictor and changing only the second one. We have called the new methods MENDF, MENBDF and MEBNDF respectively. The new methods are A-stable up to order $4$ and the stability properties of the new methods are better than the MEBDF method.
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1212-m3987}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/9728.html} }In this paper we modify the MEBDF method using the NDFs as predictors instead of the BDFs. We have done it in three different ways: changing both predictors of the MEBDF, changing only the first predictor and changing only the second one. We have called the new methods MENDF, MENBDF and MEBNDF respectively. The new methods are A-stable up to order $4$ and the stability properties of the new methods are better than the MEBDF method.