- Journal Home
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
The main results of this paper are as follows: (1) Suppose an s stage Runge-Kutta method is consistent, irreducible, non-confluent and symplectic. Then this method is of order at least $2p+l(1 \le p \le s-1)$ provided that the simplifying conditions $C(p)$ (or $D(p)$ with non-zero weights) and $B(2p+l)$ hold, where $l=0,1,2.$ (2) Suppose an s stage Runge-Kutta method is consistent, irreducible and non-confluent, and satisfies the simplifying conditions $C(p)$ and $D(p)$ with $0 < p \le s.$ Then this method is symplectic if and only if either $p = s$ or the nonlinear stablility matrix $M$ of the method has an $(s-p)×(s-p)$ chief submatrix $\hat{M}=0.$ (3) Using the results (1) and (2) as bases, we present a general approach for the construction of symplectic Runge-Kutta methods, and a software has benn designed, by means of which, the coefficients of s stage symplectic Runge-Kutta methods satisfying $C(p), D(p)$ and $B(2p+l)$ can be easily computed, where $1 \le p \le s, 0 \le l \le 2, s \le 2p+l \le 2s.$
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/9075.html} }The main results of this paper are as follows: (1) Suppose an s stage Runge-Kutta method is consistent, irreducible, non-confluent and symplectic. Then this method is of order at least $2p+l(1 \le p \le s-1)$ provided that the simplifying conditions $C(p)$ (or $D(p)$ with non-zero weights) and $B(2p+l)$ hold, where $l=0,1,2.$ (2) Suppose an s stage Runge-Kutta method is consistent, irreducible and non-confluent, and satisfies the simplifying conditions $C(p)$ and $D(p)$ with $0 < p \le s.$ Then this method is symplectic if and only if either $p = s$ or the nonlinear stablility matrix $M$ of the method has an $(s-p)×(s-p)$ chief submatrix $\hat{M}=0.$ (3) Using the results (1) and (2) as bases, we present a general approach for the construction of symplectic Runge-Kutta methods, and a software has benn designed, by means of which, the coefficients of s stage symplectic Runge-Kutta methods satisfying $C(p), D(p)$ and $B(2p+l)$ can be easily computed, where $1 \le p \le s, 0 \le l \le 2, s \le 2p+l \le 2s.$