- Journal Home
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
We consider optimal shape design in Stokes flow using $H^1$ shape gradient flows based on the distributed Eulerian derivatives. MINI element is used for discretizations of Stokes equation and Galerkin finite element is used for discretizations of distributed and boundary $H^1$ shape gradient flows. Convergence analysis with a priori error estimates is provided under general and different regularity assumptions. We investigate the performances of shape gradient descent algorithms for energy dissipation minimization and obstacle flow. Numerical comparisons in 2D and 3D show that the distributed $H^1$ shape gradient flow is more accurate than the popular boundary type. The corresponding distributed shape gradient algorithm is more effective.
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.2009-m2020-0020}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/20185.html} }We consider optimal shape design in Stokes flow using $H^1$ shape gradient flows based on the distributed Eulerian derivatives. MINI element is used for discretizations of Stokes equation and Galerkin finite element is used for discretizations of distributed and boundary $H^1$ shape gradient flows. Convergence analysis with a priori error estimates is provided under general and different regularity assumptions. We investigate the performances of shape gradient descent algorithms for energy dissipation minimization and obstacle flow. Numerical comparisons in 2D and 3D show that the distributed $H^1$ shape gradient flow is more accurate than the popular boundary type. The corresponding distributed shape gradient algorithm is more effective.