- Journal Home
- Volume 42 - 2024
- Volume 41 - 2023
- Volume 40 - 2022
- Volume 39 - 2021
- Volume 38 - 2020
- Volume 37 - 2019
- Volume 36 - 2018
- Volume 35 - 2017
- Volume 34 - 2016
- Volume 33 - 2015
- Volume 32 - 2014
- Volume 31 - 2013
- Volume 30 - 2012
- Volume 29 - 2011
- Volume 28 - 2010
- Volume 27 - 2009
- Volume 26 - 2008
- Volume 25 - 2007
- Volume 24 - 2006
- Volume 23 - 2005
- Volume 22 - 2004
- Volume 21 - 2003
- Volume 20 - 2002
- Volume 19 - 2001
- Volume 18 - 2000
- Volume 17 - 1999
- Volume 16 - 1998
- Volume 15 - 1997
- Volume 14 - 1996
- Volume 13 - 1995
- Volume 12 - 1994
- Volume 11 - 1993
- Volume 10 - 1992
- Volume 9 - 1991
- Volume 8 - 1990
- Volume 7 - 1989
- Volume 6 - 1988
- Volume 5 - 1987
- Volume 4 - 1986
- Volume 3 - 1985
- Volume 2 - 1984
- Volume 1 - 1983
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In this paper, we present two alternating direction methods for the solution and best approximate solution of the Sylvester-type matrix equation $AXB+CX^⊤D=E$ arising in the control theory, where $A,B,C,D$ and $E$ are given matrices of suitable sizes. If the matrix equation is consistent (inconsistent), then the solution (the least squares solution) can be obtained. Preliminary convergence properties of the proposed algorithms are presented. Numerical experiments show that the proposed algorithms tend to deliver higher quality solutions with less iteration steps and CPU time than some existing algorithms on the tested problems.
}, issn = {1991-7139}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1608-m2015-0430}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jcm/10035.html} }In this paper, we present two alternating direction methods for the solution and best approximate solution of the Sylvester-type matrix equation $AXB+CX^⊤D=E$ arising in the control theory, where $A,B,C,D$ and $E$ are given matrices of suitable sizes. If the matrix equation is consistent (inconsistent), then the solution (the least squares solution) can be obtained. Preliminary convergence properties of the proposed algorithms are presented. Numerical experiments show that the proposed algorithms tend to deliver higher quality solutions with less iteration steps and CPU time than some existing algorithms on the tested problems.