- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Two algorithms for dwell time adjustment are evaluated under the same polishing conditions that involve tool and work distributions. Both methods are based on Preston's hypothesis. The first method is a convolution algorithm based on the Fast Fourier Transform. The second is an iterative method based on a constraint problem, extended from a one-dimensional formulation to address a two-dimensional problem. Both methods are investigated for their computational cost, accuracy, and polishing shapes. The convolution method has high accuracy and high speed. The constraint problem on the other hand is slow even when it requires larger memory and thus is more costly. However, unlike the other case a negative region in the polishing shape is not predicted here. Furthermore, new techniques are devised by combining the two methods.
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/7975.html} }Two algorithms for dwell time adjustment are evaluated under the same polishing conditions that involve tool and work distributions. Both methods are based on Preston's hypothesis. The first method is a convolution algorithm based on the Fast Fourier Transform. The second is an iterative method based on a constraint problem, extended from a one-dimensional formulation to address a two-dimensional problem. Both methods are investigated for their computational cost, accuracy, and polishing shapes. The convolution method has high accuracy and high speed. The constraint problem on the other hand is slow even when it requires larger memory and thus is more costly. However, unlike the other case a negative region in the polishing shape is not predicted here. Furthermore, new techniques are devised by combining the two methods.