- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
A fundamental issue in CFD is the role of coordinates and, in particular, the search for "optimal" coordinates. This paper reviews and generalizes the recently developed unified coordinate system (UC). For one-dimensional flow, UC uses a material coordinate and thus coincides with Lagrangian system. For two-dimensional flow it uses a material coordinate, with the other coordinate determined so as to preserve mesh othorgonality (or the Jacobian), whereas for three-dimensional flow it uses two material coordinates, with the third one determined so as to preserve mesh skewness (or the Jacobian). The unified coordinate system combines the advantages of both Eulerian and the Lagrangian system and beyond. Specifically, the followings are shown in this paper. (a) For 1-D flow, Lagrangian system plus shock-adaptive Godunov scheme is superior to Eulerian system. (b) The governing equations in any moving multi-dimensional coordinates can be written as a system of closed conservation partial differential equations (PDE) by appending the time evolution equations – called geometric conservation laws – of the coefficients of the transformation (from Cartesian to the moving coordinates) to the physical conservation laws; consequently, effects of coordinate movement on the flow are fully accounted for. (c) The system of Lagrangian gas dynamics equations is written in conservation PDE form, thus providing a foundation for developing Lagrangian schemes as moving mesh schemes. (d) The Lagrangian system of gas dynamics equations in two- and three-dimension are shown to be only weakly hyperbolic, in direct contrast to the Eulerian system which is fully hyperbolic; hence the two systems are not equivalent to each other. (e) The unified coordinate system possesses the advantages of the Lagrangian system in that contact discontinuities (including material interfaces and free surfaces) are resolved sharply. (f) In using the UC, there is no need to generate a body-fitted mesh prior to computing flow past a body; the mesh is automatically generated by the flow. Numerical examples are given to confirm these properties. Relations of the UC approach with the Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) approach and with various moving coordinates approaches are also clarified.
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/7919.html} }A fundamental issue in CFD is the role of coordinates and, in particular, the search for "optimal" coordinates. This paper reviews and generalizes the recently developed unified coordinate system (UC). For one-dimensional flow, UC uses a material coordinate and thus coincides with Lagrangian system. For two-dimensional flow it uses a material coordinate, with the other coordinate determined so as to preserve mesh othorgonality (or the Jacobian), whereas for three-dimensional flow it uses two material coordinates, with the third one determined so as to preserve mesh skewness (or the Jacobian). The unified coordinate system combines the advantages of both Eulerian and the Lagrangian system and beyond. Specifically, the followings are shown in this paper. (a) For 1-D flow, Lagrangian system plus shock-adaptive Godunov scheme is superior to Eulerian system. (b) The governing equations in any moving multi-dimensional coordinates can be written as a system of closed conservation partial differential equations (PDE) by appending the time evolution equations – called geometric conservation laws – of the coefficients of the transformation (from Cartesian to the moving coordinates) to the physical conservation laws; consequently, effects of coordinate movement on the flow are fully accounted for. (c) The system of Lagrangian gas dynamics equations is written in conservation PDE form, thus providing a foundation for developing Lagrangian schemes as moving mesh schemes. (d) The Lagrangian system of gas dynamics equations in two- and three-dimension are shown to be only weakly hyperbolic, in direct contrast to the Eulerian system which is fully hyperbolic; hence the two systems are not equivalent to each other. (e) The unified coordinate system possesses the advantages of the Lagrangian system in that contact discontinuities (including material interfaces and free surfaces) are resolved sharply. (f) In using the UC, there is no need to generate a body-fitted mesh prior to computing flow past a body; the mesh is automatically generated by the flow. Numerical examples are given to confirm these properties. Relations of the UC approach with the Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) approach and with various moving coordinates approaches are also clarified.