arrow
Volume 35, Issue 4
A Comparative Study of Hydrodynamic Lattice Boltzmann Equation in Phase-Field-Based Multiphase Flow Models

Qiang He, Yiqian Cheng, Fengming Hu, Weifeng Huang & Decai Li

Commun. Comput. Phys., 35 (2024), pp. 859-904.

Published online: 2024-05

Export citation
  • Abstract

In recent years, phase-field-based models for multiphase flows have gained significant popularity, particularly within the lattice Boltzmann (LB) community. These models typically use two lattice Boltzmann equations (LBEs), one for interface tracking and the other for solving hydrodynamic properties. However, for the purposes of this paper, we focus only on the LB model for hydrodynamics. Our goal is to undertake a comparative investigation into the differences between three classical hydrodynamic LB models proposed by Lee et al. [1], Liang et al. [2] and Fakhari et al. [3]. The interface-tracking equation used in this study is based on the conservative phase-field model. We provide a detailed derivation of the governing equations in each model using the Chapman-Enskog analysis. Additionally, three discretization methods for the interaction forces are introduced, and a modified method for the gradient term is proposed based on the nonequilibrium distribution method. The accuracy of three LB models in combination with four discretization methods is examined in this study. Based on the results, it appears that different combinations of models and methods are appropriate for different types of problems. However, some suggestions for the selection of hydrodynamic models and discrete methods for the gradient term are provided in this paper.

  • AMS Subject Headings

76D05, 76D45, 76T10

  • Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

  • Email address
  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • TXT
@Article{CiCP-35-859, author = {He , QiangCheng , YiqianHu , FengmingHuang , Weifeng and Li , Decai}, title = {A Comparative Study of Hydrodynamic Lattice Boltzmann Equation in Phase-Field-Based Multiphase Flow Models}, journal = {Communications in Computational Physics}, year = {2024}, volume = {35}, number = {4}, pages = {859--904}, abstract = {

In recent years, phase-field-based models for multiphase flows have gained significant popularity, particularly within the lattice Boltzmann (LB) community. These models typically use two lattice Boltzmann equations (LBEs), one for interface tracking and the other for solving hydrodynamic properties. However, for the purposes of this paper, we focus only on the LB model for hydrodynamics. Our goal is to undertake a comparative investigation into the differences between three classical hydrodynamic LB models proposed by Lee et al. [1], Liang et al. [2] and Fakhari et al. [3]. The interface-tracking equation used in this study is based on the conservative phase-field model. We provide a detailed derivation of the governing equations in each model using the Chapman-Enskog analysis. Additionally, three discretization methods for the interaction forces are introduced, and a modified method for the gradient term is proposed based on the nonequilibrium distribution method. The accuracy of three LB models in combination with four discretization methods is examined in this study. Based on the results, it appears that different combinations of models and methods are appropriate for different types of problems. However, some suggestions for the selection of hydrodynamic models and discrete methods for the gradient term are provided in this paper.

}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.RE-2023-0066}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/23084.html} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Comparative Study of Hydrodynamic Lattice Boltzmann Equation in Phase-Field-Based Multiphase Flow Models AU - He , Qiang AU - Cheng , Yiqian AU - Hu , Fengming AU - Huang , Weifeng AU - Li , Decai JO - Communications in Computational Physics VL - 4 SP - 859 EP - 904 PY - 2024 DA - 2024/05 SN - 35 DO - http://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.RE-2023-0066 UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/23084.html KW - Lattice Boltzmann method, multiphase, phase-field method, hydrodynamic lattice Boltzmann equation. AB -

In recent years, phase-field-based models for multiphase flows have gained significant popularity, particularly within the lattice Boltzmann (LB) community. These models typically use two lattice Boltzmann equations (LBEs), one for interface tracking and the other for solving hydrodynamic properties. However, for the purposes of this paper, we focus only on the LB model for hydrodynamics. Our goal is to undertake a comparative investigation into the differences between three classical hydrodynamic LB models proposed by Lee et al. [1], Liang et al. [2] and Fakhari et al. [3]. The interface-tracking equation used in this study is based on the conservative phase-field model. We provide a detailed derivation of the governing equations in each model using the Chapman-Enskog analysis. Additionally, three discretization methods for the interaction forces are introduced, and a modified method for the gradient term is proposed based on the nonequilibrium distribution method. The accuracy of three LB models in combination with four discretization methods is examined in this study. Based on the results, it appears that different combinations of models and methods are appropriate for different types of problems. However, some suggestions for the selection of hydrodynamic models and discrete methods for the gradient term are provided in this paper.

He , QiangCheng , YiqianHu , FengmingHuang , Weifeng and Li , Decai. (2024). A Comparative Study of Hydrodynamic Lattice Boltzmann Equation in Phase-Field-Based Multiphase Flow Models. Communications in Computational Physics. 35 (4). 859-904. doi:10.4208/cicp.RE-2023-0066
Copy to clipboard
The citation has been copied to your clipboard