- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 34 (2023), pp. 1079-1132.
Published online: 2023-11
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Particle-resolved direct numerical flow solvers predominantly use a projection method to decouple the non-linear mass and momentum conservation equations. The computing performance of such solvers often decays beyond $\mathcal{O}(1000)$ cores due to the cost of solving at least one large three-dimensional pressure Poisson problem per time step. The parallelization may perform moderately well only or even poorly sometimes despite using an efficient algebraic multigrid preconditioner [38]. We present an accurate and scalable solver using a direction splitting algorithm [12] to transform all three-dimensional parabolic/elliptic problems (and in particular the elliptic pressure Poisson problem) into a sequence of three one-dimensional parabolic sub-problems, thus improving its scalability up to multiple thousands of cores. We employ this algorithm to solve mass and momentum conservation equations in flows laden with fixed non-spherical rigid bodies. We consider the presence of rigid bodies on the (uniform or non-uniform) fixed Cartesian fluid grid by modifying the diffusion and divergence stencils on the impacted grid node near the rigid body boundary. Compared to [12], we use a higher-order interpolation scheme for the velocity field to maintain a second-order stress estimation on the particle boundary, resulting in more accurate dimensionless coefficients such as drag $C_d$ and lift $C_l.$ We also correct the interpolation scheme due to the presence of any nearby particle to maintain an acceptable accuracy, making the solver robust even when particles are densely packed in a sub-region of the computational domain. We present classical validation tests involving a single or multiple (up to $\mathcal{O}(1000))$ rigid bodies and assess the robustness, accuracy and computing speed of the solver. We further show that the Direction Splitting solver is ∼5 times faster on 5120 cores than our solver [38] based on a classical projection method [5].
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2023-0176}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/22131.html} }Particle-resolved direct numerical flow solvers predominantly use a projection method to decouple the non-linear mass and momentum conservation equations. The computing performance of such solvers often decays beyond $\mathcal{O}(1000)$ cores due to the cost of solving at least one large three-dimensional pressure Poisson problem per time step. The parallelization may perform moderately well only or even poorly sometimes despite using an efficient algebraic multigrid preconditioner [38]. We present an accurate and scalable solver using a direction splitting algorithm [12] to transform all three-dimensional parabolic/elliptic problems (and in particular the elliptic pressure Poisson problem) into a sequence of three one-dimensional parabolic sub-problems, thus improving its scalability up to multiple thousands of cores. We employ this algorithm to solve mass and momentum conservation equations in flows laden with fixed non-spherical rigid bodies. We consider the presence of rigid bodies on the (uniform or non-uniform) fixed Cartesian fluid grid by modifying the diffusion and divergence stencils on the impacted grid node near the rigid body boundary. Compared to [12], we use a higher-order interpolation scheme for the velocity field to maintain a second-order stress estimation on the particle boundary, resulting in more accurate dimensionless coefficients such as drag $C_d$ and lift $C_l.$ We also correct the interpolation scheme due to the presence of any nearby particle to maintain an acceptable accuracy, making the solver robust even when particles are densely packed in a sub-region of the computational domain. We present classical validation tests involving a single or multiple (up to $\mathcal{O}(1000))$ rigid bodies and assess the robustness, accuracy and computing speed of the solver. We further show that the Direction Splitting solver is ∼5 times faster on 5120 cores than our solver [38] based on a classical projection method [5].