- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 30 (2021), pp. 34-66.
Published online: 2021-04
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
A Finite-Volume based POD-Galerkin reduced order model is developed for
fluid dynamics problems where the (time-dependent) boundary conditions are controlled using two different boundary control strategies: the lifting function method,
whose aim is to obtain homogeneous basis functions for the reduced basis space and
the penalty method where the boundary conditions are enforced in the reduced order
model using a penalty factor. The penalty method is improved by using an iterative
solver for the determination of the penalty factor rather than tuning the factor with a
sensitivity analysis or numerical experimentation.
The boundary control methods are compared and tested for two cases: the classical lid driven cavity benchmark problem and a Y-junction flow case with two inlet
channels and one outlet channel. The results show that the boundaries of the reduced
order model can be controlled with the boundary control methods and the same order
of accuracy is achieved for the velocity and pressure fields. Finally, the reduced order
models are 270-308 times faster than the full order models for the lid driven cavity test
case and 13-24 times for the Y-junction test case.
A Finite-Volume based POD-Galerkin reduced order model is developed for
fluid dynamics problems where the (time-dependent) boundary conditions are controlled using two different boundary control strategies: the lifting function method,
whose aim is to obtain homogeneous basis functions for the reduced basis space and
the penalty method where the boundary conditions are enforced in the reduced order
model using a penalty factor. The penalty method is improved by using an iterative
solver for the determination of the penalty factor rather than tuning the factor with a
sensitivity analysis or numerical experimentation.
The boundary control methods are compared and tested for two cases: the classical lid driven cavity benchmark problem and a Y-junction flow case with two inlet
channels and one outlet channel. The results show that the boundaries of the reduced
order model can be controlled with the boundary control methods and the same order
of accuracy is achieved for the velocity and pressure fields. Finally, the reduced order
models are 270-308 times faster than the full order models for the lid driven cavity test
case and 13-24 times for the Y-junction test case.