- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 27 (2020), pp. 1309-1343.
Published online: 2020-03
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Dealing with strong shocks while retaining low numerical dissipation traditionally has been one of the major challenges for high order methods like discontinuous Galerkin (DG). In the literature, shock capturing models have been designed for DG based on various approaches, such as slope limiting, (H)WENO reconstruction, a posteriori sub-cell limiting, and artificial viscosity, among which a subclass of artificial viscosity methods are compared in the present work. Four models are evaluated, including a dilation-based model, a highest modal decay model, an averaged modal decay model, and an entropy viscosity model. Performance for smooth, non-smooth and broadband problems are examined with typical one- and two-dimensional cases.
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2019-0118}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/15772.html} }Dealing with strong shocks while retaining low numerical dissipation traditionally has been one of the major challenges for high order methods like discontinuous Galerkin (DG). In the literature, shock capturing models have been designed for DG based on various approaches, such as slope limiting, (H)WENO reconstruction, a posteriori sub-cell limiting, and artificial viscosity, among which a subclass of artificial viscosity methods are compared in the present work. Four models are evaluated, including a dilation-based model, a highest modal decay model, an averaged modal decay model, and an entropy viscosity model. Performance for smooth, non-smooth and broadband problems are examined with typical one- and two-dimensional cases.