- Journal Home
- Volume 36 - 2024
- Volume 35 - 2024
- Volume 34 - 2023
- Volume 33 - 2023
- Volume 32 - 2022
- Volume 31 - 2022
- Volume 30 - 2021
- Volume 29 - 2021
- Volume 28 - 2020
- Volume 27 - 2020
- Volume 26 - 2019
- Volume 25 - 2019
- Volume 24 - 2018
- Volume 23 - 2018
- Volume 22 - 2017
- Volume 21 - 2017
- Volume 20 - 2016
- Volume 19 - 2016
- Volume 18 - 2015
- Volume 17 - 2015
- Volume 16 - 2014
- Volume 15 - 2014
- Volume 14 - 2013
- Volume 13 - 2013
- Volume 12 - 2012
- Volume 11 - 2012
- Volume 10 - 2011
- Volume 9 - 2011
- Volume 8 - 2010
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2009
- Volume 4 - 2008
- Volume 3 - 2008
- Volume 2 - 2007
- Volume 1 - 2006
Commun. Comput. Phys., 26 (2019), pp. 1307-1334.
Published online: 2019-08
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
We establish error bounds of the finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods for the long time dynamics of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation (NKGE) with a cubic nonlinearity, while the nonlinearity strength is characterized by ε2 with 0<ε≤1 a dimensionless parameter. When 0<ε≪1, it is in the weak nonlinearity regime and the problem is equivalent to the NKGE with small initial data, while the amplitude of the initial data (and the solution) is at O(ε). Four different FDTD methods are adapted to discretize the problem and rigorous error bounds of the FDTD methods are established for the long time dynamics, i.e. error bounds are valid up to the time at O(1/εβ) with 0 ≤ β ≤ 2, by using the energy method and the techniques of either the cut-off of the nonlinearity or the mathematical induction to bound the numerical approximate solutions. In the error bounds, we pay particular attention to how error bounds depend explicitly on the mesh size h and time step τ as well as the small parameter ε∈(0,1], especially in the weak nonlinearity regime when 0<ε≪1. Our error bounds indicate that, in order to get "correct" numerical solutions up to the time at O(1/εβ), the ε-scalability (or meshing strategy) of the FDTD methods should be taken as: h=O(εβ/2) and τ=O(εβ/2). As a by-product, our results can indicate error bounds and ε-scalability of the FDTD methods for the discretization of an oscillatory NKGE which is obtained from the case of weak nonlinearity by a rescaling in time, while its solution propagates waves with wavelength at O(1) in space and O(εβ) in time. Extensive numerical results are reported to confirm our error bounds and to demonstrate that they are sharp.
}, issn = {1991-7120}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.2019.js60.03}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cicp/13266.html} }We establish error bounds of the finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods for the long time dynamics of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation (NKGE) with a cubic nonlinearity, while the nonlinearity strength is characterized by ε2 with 0<ε≤1 a dimensionless parameter. When 0<ε≪1, it is in the weak nonlinearity regime and the problem is equivalent to the NKGE with small initial data, while the amplitude of the initial data (and the solution) is at O(ε). Four different FDTD methods are adapted to discretize the problem and rigorous error bounds of the FDTD methods are established for the long time dynamics, i.e. error bounds are valid up to the time at O(1/εβ) with 0 ≤ β ≤ 2, by using the energy method and the techniques of either the cut-off of the nonlinearity or the mathematical induction to bound the numerical approximate solutions. In the error bounds, we pay particular attention to how error bounds depend explicitly on the mesh size h and time step τ as well as the small parameter ε∈(0,1], especially in the weak nonlinearity regime when 0<ε≪1. Our error bounds indicate that, in order to get "correct" numerical solutions up to the time at O(1/εβ), the ε-scalability (or meshing strategy) of the FDTD methods should be taken as: h=O(εβ/2) and τ=O(εβ/2). As a by-product, our results can indicate error bounds and ε-scalability of the FDTD methods for the discretization of an oscillatory NKGE which is obtained from the case of weak nonlinearity by a rescaling in time, while its solution propagates waves with wavelength at O(1) in space and O(εβ) in time. Extensive numerical results are reported to confirm our error bounds and to demonstrate that they are sharp.