- Journal Home
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
This paper presents the stabilities for both two modular, projection-based variational multiscale (VMS) methods and the error analysis for only first one for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, extending the analysis in [39] to include nonlinear eddy viscosities. In VMS methods, the influence of the unresolved scales onto the resolved small scales is modeled by a Smagorinsky-type turbulent viscosity acting only on the marginally resolved scales. Different realization of VMS models arise through different models of fluctuations. We analyze a method of inducing a VMS treatment of turbulence in an existing NSE discretization through an additional, uncoupled projection step. We prove stability, identifying the VMS model and numerical dissipation and give an error estimate. Numerical tests are given that confirm and illustrate the theoretical estimates. One method uses a fully nonlinear step inducing the VMS discretization. The second induces a nonlinear eddy viscosity model with a linear solve of much less cost.
}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/605.html} }This paper presents the stabilities for both two modular, projection-based variational multiscale (VMS) methods and the error analysis for only first one for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, extending the analysis in [39] to include nonlinear eddy viscosities. In VMS methods, the influence of the unresolved scales onto the resolved small scales is modeled by a Smagorinsky-type turbulent viscosity acting only on the marginally resolved scales. Different realization of VMS models arise through different models of fluctuations. We analyze a method of inducing a VMS treatment of turbulence in an existing NSE discretization through an additional, uncoupled projection step. We prove stability, identifying the VMS model and numerical dissipation and give an error estimate. Numerical tests are given that confirm and illustrate the theoretical estimates. One method uses a fully nonlinear step inducing the VMS discretization. The second induces a nonlinear eddy viscosity model with a linear solve of much less cost.