- Journal Home
- Volume 21 - 2024
- Volume 20 - 2023
- Volume 19 - 2022
- Volume 18 - 2021
- Volume 17 - 2020
- Volume 16 - 2019
- Volume 15 - 2018
- Volume 14 - 2017
- Volume 13 - 2016
- Volume 12 - 2015
- Volume 11 - 2014
- Volume 10 - 2013
- Volume 9 - 2012
- Volume 8 - 2011
- Volume 7 - 2010
- Volume 6 - 2009
- Volume 5 - 2008
- Volume 4 - 2007
- Volume 3 - 2006
- Volume 2 - 2005
- Volume 1 - 2004
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Some optimal shape design problems lack classical solutions, or at least, the existence of such solutions is far from being straightforward. In such cases, to obtain an optimal solution, a variety of methods have been employed. In this study, we review the works that used measures which can basically be divided in two groups: using Young measures and embedding process (Shape-measure method). We also survey the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods and investigate their improved version in the presented works and applications.
}, issn = {2617-8710}, doi = {https://doi.org/}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/ijnam/13014.html} }Some optimal shape design problems lack classical solutions, or at least, the existence of such solutions is far from being straightforward. In such cases, to obtain an optimal solution, a variety of methods have been employed. In this study, we review the works that used measures which can basically be divided in two groups: using Young measures and embedding process (Shape-measure method). We also survey the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods and investigate their improved version in the presented works and applications.