Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., 14 (2022), pp. 1381-1399.
Published online: 2022-08
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
Numerical study on dynamic hydroelastic problems is usually rather complex due to the coupling of fluid and solid mechanics. Here, we demonstrate that the performance of a hydroelastic microfluidic oscillator can be analyzed using a simple equivalent circuit model. Previous studies reveal that its transition from the steady state to the oscillation state follows the negative-differential-resistance (NDR) mechanism. The performance is mainly determined by a bias fluidic resistor, and a pressure-variant resistor which further relates to the bending stiffness of the elastic diaphragm and the depth of the oscillation chamber. In this work, a numerical study is conducted to examine the effects of key design factors on the device robustness, the applicable fluid viscosity, the flow rate, and the transition pressure. The underlying physics is interpreted, providing a new perspective on hydroelastic oscillation problems. Relevant findings also provide design guidelines of the NDR fluidic oscillator.
}, issn = {2075-1354}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4208/aamm.OA-2021-0269}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/aamm/20852.html} }Numerical study on dynamic hydroelastic problems is usually rather complex due to the coupling of fluid and solid mechanics. Here, we demonstrate that the performance of a hydroelastic microfluidic oscillator can be analyzed using a simple equivalent circuit model. Previous studies reveal that its transition from the steady state to the oscillation state follows the negative-differential-resistance (NDR) mechanism. The performance is mainly determined by a bias fluidic resistor, and a pressure-variant resistor which further relates to the bending stiffness of the elastic diaphragm and the depth of the oscillation chamber. In this work, a numerical study is conducted to examine the effects of key design factors on the device robustness, the applicable fluid viscosity, the flow rate, and the transition pressure. The underlying physics is interpreted, providing a new perspective on hydroelastic oscillation problems. Relevant findings also provide design guidelines of the NDR fluidic oscillator.