Comparative Study of Chinese and International Standard Systems on Chemical Protective Clothing
DOI:
10.3993/jfbi03201306
Journal of Fiber Bioengineering & Informatics, 6 (2013), pp. 63-75.
Published online: 2013-06
Cited by
Export citation
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
@Article{JFBI-6-63,
author = {Jian Li, Rong Zheng, Hong Zhou and Jing Guo},
title = {Comparative Study of Chinese and International Standard Systems on Chemical Protective Clothing},
journal = {Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics},
year = {2013},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {63--75},
abstract = {Through the comparative analysis of China's national and international standard systems on chemical
protective clothing (CPC), this paper summarizes the differences in classification and minimum
performance requirements between several standard systems. The study provides the most basic
performance assessment factors for all types of CPC. It can also be observed that the standard systems
of European Standards (EN) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) have similar
classifications and performance requirements for CPC, while China's standard systems (GB) mainly give
detailed requirements for emergency team CPC as a supplement for previous international standards.},
issn = {2617-8699},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.3993/jfbi03201306},
url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jfbi/4822.html}
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Study of Chinese and International Standard Systems on Chemical Protective Clothing
AU - Jian Li, Rong Zheng, Hong Zhou & Jing Guo
JO - Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics
VL - 1
SP - 63
EP - 75
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/06
SN - 6
DO - http://doi.org/10.3993/jfbi03201306
UR - https://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/jfbi/4822.html
KW - Chemical Protective Clothing
KW - Standard
KW - Classification
KW - Performance
AB - Through the comparative analysis of China's national and international standard systems on chemical
protective clothing (CPC), this paper summarizes the differences in classification and minimum
performance requirements between several standard systems. The study provides the most basic
performance assessment factors for all types of CPC. It can also be observed that the standard systems
of European Standards (EN) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) have similar
classifications and performance requirements for CPC, while China's standard systems (GB) mainly give
detailed requirements for emergency team CPC as a supplement for previous international standards.
Jian Li, Rong Zheng, Hong Zhou and Jing Guo. (2013). Comparative Study of Chinese and International Standard Systems on Chemical Protective Clothing.
Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics. 6 (1).
63-75.
doi:10.3993/jfbi03201306
Copy to clipboard