- Journal Home
- Volume 41 - 2025
- Volume 40 - 2024
- Volume 39 - 2023
- Volume 38 - 2022
- Volume 37 - 2021
- Volume 36 - 2020
- Volume 35 - 2019
- Volume 34 - 2018
- Volume 33 - 2017
- Volume 32 - 2016
- Volume 31 - 2015
- Volume 30 - 2014
- Volume 29 - 2013
- Volume 28 - 2012
- Volume 27 - 2011
- Volume 26 - 2010
- Volume 25 - 2009
Commun. Math. Res., 32 (2016), pp. 319-324.
Published online: 2021-05
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In recent study the bank of real square integrable functions that have nonlinear phases and admit a well-behaved Hilbert transform has been constructed for adaptive representation of nonlinear signals. We first show in this paper that the available basic functions are adequate for establishing an ideal adaptive decomposition algorithm. However, we also point out that the best approximation algorithm, which is a common strategy in decomposing a function into a sum of functions in a prescribed class of basis functions, should not be considered as a candidate for the ideal algorithm.
}, issn = {2707-8523}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.13447/j.1674-5647.2016.04.03}, url = {http://global-sci.org/intro/article_detail/cmr/18903.html} }In recent study the bank of real square integrable functions that have nonlinear phases and admit a well-behaved Hilbert transform has been constructed for adaptive representation of nonlinear signals. We first show in this paper that the available basic functions are adequate for establishing an ideal adaptive decomposition algorithm. However, we also point out that the best approximation algorithm, which is a common strategy in decomposing a function into a sum of functions in a prescribed class of basis functions, should not be considered as a candidate for the ideal algorithm.